What are obstacles to successfully implementing AI?

In 2023, Gartner found that 79% of business strategists considered the use of AI to be crucial for their company’s success in the next two years. However, AI had only been integrated into daily operations in 20% of cases. It turns out that successful implementation of AI hinges on two things: (1) what AI can actually do – which is improving rapidly – and (2) the willingness of people to genuinely integrate AI into their work.

In the February 2025 issue of the Harvard Business Review, Julian De Freitas, Assistant Professor at Harvard Business School, describes five obstacles to successful implementation and how to address them. What he describes is fully aligned with what we at Hi Automation experience during our implementations:

  1. AI is too opaque – a “black box.”
  2. AI has no emotions
  3. AI is not sufficiently flexible
  4. AI is too autonomous
  5. People prefer interaction with people

On top of that, there is the general concern that the introduction of AI will come at the expense of jobs. That there is a growing risk of data being used with malicious intent. And that roughly half of people believe a day will come when AI will attack humanity. Implementing AI within this general context is already a major challenge. And on top of that, the aforementioned obstacles must also be addressed in any specific company implementation.

That humans must be at the center of AI implementation and continued use is therefore evident. Being in close contact from the start and deeply understanding the underlying emotions and needs is crucial. Addressing these effectively is no easy task. An explanation in the context of an obstacle may be logically sound in itself, but may actually have the opposite effect and increase resistance.

This post is meant to point out these issues to you, not to delve into them further. The subject is too complex for that. The HBR article gives you an initial, somewhat deeper impression. Together with our subsidiary Hi automation, we at Axisto Group have the knowledge and on-the-ground experience and are happy to support you further.

Additional reading: How to achieve sustainable change at speed?

Related insights

Axisto-Artificial-Intelligence

What are obstacles to successfully implementing AI?

Successful implementation of AI hinges on two things: (1) what AI can actually do – which is improving rapidly – and (2) the willingness of people to genuinely integrate AI into their work.

Hi-automation-ESG-reporting-with-UiPath-RPA-and-RaccoonDoc-IDP

Automate Your ESG Reporting with RPA and IDP – Better Reporting and Enhanced Sustainability Efforts

ESG reporting means consolidate information across multiple departments and systems. This process is prone to errors and consumes lots of time. RPA in combination with RaccoonDoc Intelligent Document Processing drives up quality and drive down the time involved.

Axisto-Group-Intelligent-Document-Processing-scaled

Intelligent Document Processing in the Construction Sector – a step change in operational and financial performance

The image of a fairly traditional Dutch construction sector is rapidly shifting to a sector that is innovating and digitalizing. Under the pressure of changing regulations regarding nitrogen and sustainability, rising procurement costs that are more and more difficult to pass on, and a shortage of skilled labour, the sector is now developing quickly. Hi…

Related cases

Axisto - RPA in Engineering

Software Robots support Equipment Engineers at an oil & chemicals company

It turned out that the Engineers had to perform a lot of repetitive, manual, clicking, copying, and pasting that suit RPA well. The implementation of RPA has saved 5.5 man-years — and the savings still continue to grow.

Mehr Effizienz im Containerterminal durch bessere Planung

More processing capacity for a container terminal by better efficiency

Better terminal efficiency for faster truck and ship turnaround by better planning with the Axisto Planning Platform.

image3-4

Improving production reliability

The company had cut costs heavily in the recession. Now that demand picked up again, things went wrong. A firm intervention put it on track.